Men Are Family Caregivers Too

About four in 10 family caregivers are men—sons, husbands, brothers, sons-in-law, or neighbors. We are nearly always ignored in discussions about caregiving, lost in the stereotype of the family caregiver as a 40-something daughter.

Finally, AARP is shining a much-needed spotlight on these men. A new study by Jean Accius at AARP’s Public Policy Institute paints a valuable, and rare, picture of male family caregivers. The organization has supplemented Jean’s paper with a series of videos  highlighting men who care for loved ones with serious illnesses.  It is even sponsoring a public service ad starring tough guy actor Danny Trejo. The message: “Caregiving is tougher than tough.”

We May Be About To See A Big Change In How Long-Term Care Insurance Is Priced

The way you pay for long-term care insurance policies may be about to change in a big way.

Genworth, the biggest seller of stand-alone long-term care insurance, is about to ask state insurance regulators for permission to fundamentally revise the way it structures premiums. Instead of holding premiums flat for several years followed by big double-digit rate hikes, it wants to be able to revise premiums annually.

In this design, unfortunately called the Annual Rate Sufficiency Model, buyers of new policies would likely see modest, single-digit rate hikes each year or two. If Genworth thinks it is likely to pay fewer claims than expected or if investment income is higher than projected, consumers might even see small rate reductions in some years.

Despite Medicare, Seniors Will Pay More For Medical Care In Coming Years

Medicare is a critical lifeline for older adults who need health care as they age. But a new study shows that over the next two decades, out-of-pocket medical costs for older adults are likely to rise significantly, even with access to Medicare.

By 2035, a typical senior will spend one out of every seven dollars of retirement income on medical care, a 40 percent increase from 2012. The study, by Laura Hatfield, Thomas McGuire, and Michael Chernew of the Harvard Medical School and my Urban Institute colleague Melissa Favreault, projected that out-of-pocket cost increases will hit poor and near-poor households hardest.  It was published in the journal Health Services Research (paywall).

The House GOP’s Medicaid Plan Will Mean More Flexibility, Less Money For States, Worse Care

House Republicans are right that Medicaid needs to be more flexible. But more flexibility with far fewer dollars won’t improve care for seniors, younger people with disabilities, or other beneficiaries of the program. It is possible to cut red tape without slashing spending. Congress should give it a try.

Medicaid is a critical safety net for people who need personal assistance and other supports because they are frail or disabled. Besides families themselves, the program is the biggest payer of long-term supports and services, spending about $140 billion annually on this care for frail elders and younger people with disabilities. And it helps the most vulnerable seniors. While the rules vary by state, in general people are only eligible if they make less than about $735-a-month, have less than $2,000 in financial assets, and have a high level of functional or cognitive impairment.

Trump’s Budget Framework Points To Big Cuts In Programs For Seniors

President Trump’s initial budget framework would slash programs for seniors and younger people with disabilities, especially those aiming to remain at home rather than move to a nursing home or other residential care. Combined with the House GOP’s proposed health plan, it may severely limit access to federally-funded medical care, personal assistance, and other supports and services.

A Closer Look At The House GOP Health Bill And Seniors: It Isn’t Getting Better

From the perspective of older adults, there is little good to say about the House Republican health care bill. The American Health Care Act (AHCA) would significantly raise insurance costs for people in their 50s and 60s, reduce important Medicaid benefits for the frail elderly, and put more financial pressure on Medicare.

Last week, I took a first look at what the plan would mean, but we have more information about the effects of the AHCA, so let’s take a closer look:

The House GOP Health Plan Would Be The Biggest Change For Seniors In A  Half-Century

House Republicans have proposed a major rewrite of the Affordable Care Act that would increase the cost of health insurance for older workers and profoundly change the Medicaid support system for the most vulnerable. It would be the biggest change in government assistance for long-term care since the creation of Medicaid a half century ago.

The proposal would retain the basic structure of the law but redesign individual insurance subsidies and sharply reduce the federal payments to the Medicaid program. The likely bottom line for seniors: Higher premiums and out-of-pocket costs for those aged 60 and older who are not yet enrolled in Medicare, and reduced benefits for low-income seniors who are receiving long-term services and supports from Medicaid.

Congress Should Not Kill End-Of-Life Talks Just As Physicians And Patients Are Having Them

We may be about to have a new debate over “death panels.” If we do, it would be a tragedy for tens of millions of Americans and their families.

You may remember this small piece of the Affordable Care Act that garnered outsized attention back in 2010. It allowed Medicare to pay physicians for having end-of-life conversations with their patients. The program, which the Obama Administration delayed for years in the face of conservative political pressure, finally came on line last year. And Kaiser Health News reports that it is catching on more quickly than expected.

Medicare’s Cruel Paradox: It Is A Costly Subsidy For Seniors, But They Can’t Live Without It

Which statement is true? 1) Medicare will impose huge burdens on future taxpayers by providing trillions of dollars in government-funded health care to older adults. 2) Many seniors face massive, unaffordable out-of-pocket health costs in old age, even with that government assistance.

The answer is: Both.  And that’s the challenge policymakers must confront as they debate what to do about the Medicare program as 77 million Boomers move inexorably into old age.

Stop Talking About Obamacare. It is Bad For Our Health

As the debate over remaking the US health system heats up, I’d like to make a modest request: Let’s stop talking about Obamacare.  Drop the partisan, misleading, counterproductive, and increasingly irrelevant hot button label. Instead let’s talk about the pros and cons of what are likely to be some complex and far-reaching changes to the way Americans get their medical care. No more toxic labels.

The very word Obamacare drives policymakers into a frenzy.  Yet, it mischaracterizes the current state of the individual health insurance market: Day-by-day, the law enacted in 2010 is already being changed, so whatever it is, it is no longer Obamacare. And the very word forces lawmakers into their partisan corners and makes it impossible for them to design a sustainable, well-functioning system.